ConceptForge - App Idea generation
A concept for an AI-driven app idea platform with business analysis capabilities. Proposed features included browsing validated app concepts, generating custom ideas tailored to budget and expertise, and providing market analysis and implementation roadmaps.
The Idea Database That Stayed An Idea
ConceptForge was conceived as a curated database of validated app ideas with comprehensive business analysis. The pitch: skip weeks of research and validation work by browsing hundreds of AI-generated app concepts, each with market analysis, technical requirements, revenue projections, and implementation roadmaps.
Instead of staring at a blank page wondering what to build, entrepreneurs and developers could browse pre-analysed ideas filtered by budget, timeline, industry, team size, and complexity. Find something that fits your constraints, get all the research done for you, and start building immediately.
The platform would include:
- Hundreds of pre-generated app ideas across different industries
- AI-driven business analysis for each concept
- Personalized recommendations based on your preferences
- Idea comparison tools
- Collaboration features for teams
- Progress tracking for ideas in development
- Export functionality for pitches and briefs
It was basically "Netflix for app ideas" with serious business analysis attached to each one. And just like RepoStache, I never built it. Same story, different domain name.
What Actually Happened
I registered conceptforge.app, built a landing page, added an early access signup form, and let it sit for six months. Zero signups. Zero marketing. Zero follow-through. The pattern was identical to RepoStache:
- Get excited about an idea
- Build a polished landing page
- Tell myself I'll market it later
- Work full-time job
- Never market it
- Get zero signups
- Quietly take it offline
At least I was consistent.
Why It Never Happened
1. Same Problems, Different Domain
ConceptForge had all the same issues as RepoStache:
- Too large in scope for a solo dev
- Required sustained effort over months
- Needed significant content generation upfront
- Demanded ongoing curation and quality control
- Full-time job left minimal bandwidth
Building hundreds of quality app ideas with legitimate business analysis wasn't a weekend project. Even with AI doing the heavy lifting, curating and validating that content would be substantial work.
2. The Content Generation Problem
The entire value proposition depended on having a large database of high-quality, well-analysed app ideas. That meant I needed to:
- Generate hundreds of diverse app concepts
- Run market analysis for each one
- Create revenue projections with realistic assumptions
- Map out technical requirements and tech stacks
- Build implementation roadmaps
- Organise everything with proper categorisation
Even automating most of this with AI, quality control and curation would be massive. And launching with just 10-20 ideas wouldn't provide enough value to justify a subscription.
3. The Chicken and Egg Problem (Again)
Users wouldn't pay for a subscription until the database was substantial. But building a substantial database without paying users meant months of unpaid work. Classic marketplace/platform problem. I could have launched with a smaller MVP and grown over time, but that required commitment I didn't have.
4. Competitive Reality
The "app idea generator" space already has plenty of free tools. Most are garbage, sure, but they exist. Charging for curated, analysed ideas required demonstrating significantly better quality than the free alternatives. That meant either exceptional content quality (time-intensive) or a unique angle I didn't have.
5. Still No Passion
Just like RepoStache, this was an idea that looked good on paper but didn't excite me. I wasn't the target user. I don't browse databases of app ideas looking for my next project. I build things that solve problems I personally encounter. Building something for a user persona I didn't understand or relate to was a recipe for mediocrity.
What I Learned (Round Two)
1. I Have A Pattern
Building landing pages for projects I'll never complete was becoming a habit. At least I was getting good at recognising it early instead of wasting months on actual development. The landing page served the same psychological purpose both times: it let me feel productive while avoiding the hard admission that I didn't want to build the thing.
2. Market Validation Requires Marketing
Zero signups doesn't tell you anything useful if you don't do any marketing. Maybe the idea is terrible. Maybe my positioning is wrong. Maybe the audience exists but can't find me. Without actually putting the landing page in front of potential users and measuring their response, the zero signups are meaningless data. I was validating my lack of marketing effort, not the idea itself.
3. Platform Businesses Are Not Side Projects
This is the second time I tried to convince myself I could build a platform business as a side project while working full-time. The second time I realised mid-way through (or rather, pre-way through) that it wasn't realistic. Some things require full-time focus. Platform businesses are one of them.
4. Know Your Strengths
I'm good at building focused tools that solve specific problems. AI letter generators, menu bar audio players, time tracking apps. Things with clear scope and defined features. I'm not (currently) good at building platforms with ongoing content curation, community management, and network effects. That's a different skill set that requires different resources.
5. The Landing Page Is A Crutch
At this point, the landing page pattern was becoming an excuse. Instead of actually testing ideas, I was using landing pages as permission slips to not build things. "I'll just put up a landing page and see if anyone signs up" sounds like validation but without marketing, it's just procrastination with extra steps.
The Real Story
Here's what actually happened: I had an idea that sounded entrepreneurial and exciting. Building a platform! Creating value! Solving problems! But deep down, I knew I didn't want to build it. Too much work, too little passion, wrong fit for my constraints. So I built a landing page instead because that was easy and made me feel like I was making progress.
Then I told myself I'd market it later when I had time. Knowing full well I wouldn't. The landing page became a socially acceptable way to abandon an idea before starting. And you know what? That's actually fine. Better to recognise this early and move on than force yourself to build something you don't want to build.
What I'd Do Differently
If I were to revisit this concept (I won't, but let's pretend):
-
Start with manual curation, not AI generation. Spend a month finding 20-30 genuinely interesting app ideas with real research. If people will pay for that, scale up. If not, you've saved months of building.
-
Target a specific niche. Don't try to cover all industries and budgets. Pick one: "SaaS ideas for solo founders" or "Mobile app ideas for small agencies". Get traction there first.
-
Make it free with premium features. Give away the basic idea database, charge for the detailed analysis, collaboration features, and exports. Easier to build an audience.
-
Partner with someone who cares. Find a co-founder who's genuinely excited about curating business ideas. Let them drive it while you build.
-
Actually market the landing page. If you're going to test validation, at least share it on Reddit, Twitter, indie hacker communities. Get real feedback, not silence.
-
Or just don't build it. This is still probably the best advice.
The Pattern Recognition
Two landing pages, two abandoned platform ideas, same story both times. At this point, the pattern is clear:
I get excited about platform businesses because they sound impressive and entrepreneurial. Then reality sets in: they're massive undertakings that require sustained effort, ongoing content/community management, solving cold start problems, and passion that I don't have.
So I build landing pages instead. They're achievable in a weekend, they look professional, and they let me convince myself I'm being strategic by "validating first." But I'm not really validating. I'm just building escape hatches.
The Takeaway
ConceptForge taught me the same lesson as RepoStache, just more clearly. I'm not built for platform businesses right now. Not with a full-time job, not without co-founders, not without genuine passion for the problem. And that's okay. Recognising what you're not good at or not positioned for is valuable. It helps you focus on the things you are good at.
I'm good at building focused tools quickly. I'm good at AI integration. I'm good at clean UIs and solid UX. I should stick to those strengths and stop convincing myself I can single-handedly build the next big platform business in my spare time.
Conclusion
ConceptForge never became more than a landing page, and that's the right outcome. Not every idea deserves to be built. Not every project fits your constraints. Not every opportunity is actually an opportunity for you specifically.
Sometimes the smartest thing you can do is recognise a mismatch early and walk away. I'm getting better at that.
The landing page still exists somewhere in my archives, a monument to ambition tempered by self-awareness. Maybe someday someone else will build ConceptForge properly. It won't be me, and I'm okay with that. Two landing pages, zero platforms, two valuable lessons about knowing your limits. Not a bad return on investment for two weekends of work.
Would I Recommend Building This?
No. But I would recommend recognising when you're using "validation" as an excuse to avoid admitting you don't want to build something. That's the real lesson here. Meta-Irony Level: Building a database of app ideas, never building it, learning that some ideas should stay ideas. Perfect.